What are the long-term health effects of earthquakes? Meta-analysis results and implications for epidemiological practice

Alba Ripoll Gallardo, Barbara Pacelli and Elias Allara

authors

Population growth and urbanisation of seismic areas are leading to a constant increase in the health-related and economic toll of earthquakes. In 2014 alone, 324 natural disasters were reported worldwide, resulting in 141 million casualties and nearly $100 billion in damage. Geophysical disasters, including earthquakes, accounted for about 10% of these events.

Although the impact of earthquakes in the response phase – that is, immediately or shortly after the main seismic event – has been well studied, we have little knowledge of the effects of earthquakes in the medium and long term. This uncertainty may cause inefficient planning of post-earthquake epidemiological surveillance, resulting in potential underestimation of public health needs.

Figure 1
Credit: Fabrizio Bramerini. Reproduced with permission from: Epidemiol Prev 2016; 40 (2) Suppl 1: 10-11.

For these reasons, in our review recently published in the IJE, we attempted to systematically organise the extant epidemiological knowledge about the post-response phase – that is, at least one month after the main seismic event. We searched common medical databases as well as several sources of grey literature, and we set no limitations in our search string regarding the diseases or earthquake investigated.

From the results of our search, we analysed 52 studies conducted over the past 30 years, involving individual-level data from more than 80,000 participants, and aggregated data – in which individual participant characteristics were not available in the denominator – from more than 50 million people. We included observational studies focusing on health indicators measured at least one month after earthquakes occurred in high-income countries. Reasons for exclusion included lack of a comparison group, inability to distinguish the health effects of the earthquake from those of other disasters that occurred simultaneously, and lack of quantitative data.

In our analysis, we found increased all-cause mortality, with strong evidence of greater mortality rates from myocardial infarction and stroke, and higher mean levels of glycated haemoglobin among people exposed to earthquakes compared with those who were not exposed (see figure below). We also found evidence of an increase in gastric ulcers and consumption of antipsychotic medications, although these findings were based on individual studies, as well as mixed evidence about possible effects of earthquakes on antidepressant consumption and infectious diseases.

Figure 2

These findings indicate the need for improvement of current epidemiological surveillance systems.

First, our work shows that extending the follow-up after the recovery phase (at least 24 months) is useful because multiple health conditions have been associated with earthquakes in the long term.

Second, as lack of a comparison group was a common reason for exclusion of studies from our review, researchers should be encouraged to adopt an appropriate observational design for future studies – ideally, a cohort design with at least one study group that includes people not exposed to the earthquake.

Third, given the breadth and potential complexity of many health-related outcomes, future surveillance should be planned using a centralised and multidisciplinary approach, including professionals such as epidemiologists, statisticians and public health professionals, to ensure the identification of appropriate study indicators and the development of efficient, standardised protocols that enable harmonised data collection and analysis.

Finally, future studies should make more regular use of routinely collected data, such as electronic health records, which would enable detailed assessment of earthquake effects in the long term.

Read more:

Ripoll Gallardo A, Pacelli B, Alesina M, et al. Medium- and long-term health effects of earthquakes in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, dyy130, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy130.


Alba Ripoll Gallardo is an academic anaesthetist and intensivist with experience working in various humanitarian settings. She is a postdoctoral fellow at CRIMEDIM (Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine; a WHO Collaborating Centre) in Novara, Italy, and coordinates an international training program in humanitarian health developed in collaboration with Médecins Sans Frontières.

Barbara Pacelli is a biostatistician at the Regional Health and Social Care Agency of Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy, and her research focuses on socio-environmental epidemiology.

Elias Allara is a public health doctor with training in epidemiology and medical statistics, currently studying towards a PhD in population health and genomics at the Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s